ArticleTraffic injury prevention2025
Impact of naturalistic cannabis use on lateral control and speed: A driving simulator study.
Article in Traffic injury prevention, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Edible cannabis use on simulated driving performance.Traffic injury prevention · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveCannabis has been shown to impair driving performance, but much of extant research has been conducted with relatively low concentration products, not reflective of the marketplace in states with legal adult recreational cannabis use. The study examined driving performance after cannabis use, inclusive of high concentration tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) products.
methodsParticipants (
resultsThere were significant changes in lane departures, SDLP and speed measures from baseline to post use, depending on the participant group and time point. When compared to the control group, the occasional-flower group had a greater increase in rate of lane departures (0.16 departures/minute at baseline and 0.47 at Post 1,
conclusionsThe occasional-flower group exhibited an increase in lane departures, not seen in other groups, consistent with tolerance in the daily-use groups. There was a notable absence of declines in driving performance for the daily-concentrate group. Changes in driving performance were relatively small across all groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.