ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Temporal Dynamics of Subtle Cognitive Change: Validation of a User-Friendly Multidomain Digital Assessment Using an Alcohol Challenge.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical trials in neurological and psychiatric indications are hampered by poor measurement fidelity in currently used "standardized" rating scales. Digital, repeatable tests that can be remotely administered offer a more fine-grained understanding of the patient's clinical trajectory. Several such tools are being developed, but only a few have been validated in terms of their ability to discern and describe change over time-a critical element of clinical trials.
objectiveFour cognitive tasks from a digital battery (delivered via tablet) are administered at high frequency following an alcohol challenge to assess sensitivity to change. The tasks are novel, repeatable, and self-administered implementations of classic neurobehavioral paradigms.
methodsThirty healthy younger adults were assessed on 2 separate days, once under the influence of alcohol and once under a placebo, with order counterbalanced. Each day included 8 assessments. The tasks comprised novel, engaging implementations of the Digit Symbol Substitution Task (DSST), reaction time, N-back working memory, and visual associative/episodic memory, and were compared with benchmark measures. In-laboratory assessments were preceded by massed practice (3 sessions), and blood alcohol concentration was monitored throughout using a breathalyzer and a Visual Analog Scale.
resultsAlcohol-related impairment was observed across multiple measures, followed by a return to baseline as blood alcohol concentration declined. A slight practice effect was noted between the first and second sessions for the digital DSST, along with a longer-term effect across the 2 days. Moderate to strong correlations between digital and benchmark measures were observed at peak intoxication.
conclusionsUnder alcohol challenge, this battery, along with benchmark standardized tests, demonstrates sensitivity to subtle changes in cognitive performance over time. Practice effects are minimal within this condensed protocol. Patient-friendly, repeatable tests administered via a digital platform, such as those in the current battery, warrant further investigation in the context of remote clinical studies that require methodological approaches capable of discerning and describing small changes over time. The availability of validated single tests or test batteries as sensitive tools that can be easily and frequently administered (eg, daily) would address a critical gap: the lack of descriptors with sufficient sensitivity, specificity, and reliability to detect cognitive changes over time in clinical trials of new therapies for neurological and psychiatric conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.