Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40506504›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Nephrology2025

Sepsis criteria and kidney function: eliminating sex, age and economic status biases.

Ayse Akcan Arikan, Marlies Ostermann, Stuart L Goldstein, John A Kellum

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ayse Akcan ArikanDivisions of Critical Care and Nephrology, Department of Paediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Marlies OstermannDepartment of Intensive Care, King's College London, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9500-9080
Stuart L GoldsteinDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
John A KellumCenter for Critical Care Nephrology, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. kellum@pitt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1995-2653

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The kidney is a target organ for the dysregulated host response to infection that defines sepsis, and acute kidney injury (AKI) is often an early manifestation of this response. Current sepsis criteria for adults (Sepsis-3) continue to include outmoded measures of kidney health, such as absolute creatinine values, which are used in organ failure scoring independently of baseline kidney function or treatment with dialysis. This approach perpetuates disparities, as older female patients require much larger decreases in kidney function compared with young male patients to achieve the same 'renal domain' points, exacerbating sex- and age-based inequities in health assessment and response. Furthermore, the latest data-driven machine learning-assisted paediatric sepsis criteria (the Phoenix Sepsis Score) have excluded kidney function entirely from sepsis diagnosis. Consequently, these criteria will exclude a child with pneumonia and associated AKI, even if receiving dialysis, from a sepsis diagnosis unless other organs fail. This inconsistency, given the extensive refinement and validation of AKI diagnostic criteria over the past three decades, is unacceptable. Current criteria for diagnosis of sepsis in both adults and children fail to incorporate crucial advances in the diagnosis of kidney disease. We maintain that it is imperative that kidney injury is quantified accurately in sepsis scoring systems free of sex, race and other biases.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjurySepsisAdultAge FactorsChildFemaleHumansMaleSex Factors

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.