ArticleCancers2025
Development of a Digital Application Program Based on an Institutional Algorithm Sustaining the Decisional Process for Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Large and Ptotic Breasts: A Pilot Study.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A New Way to Wrap: Innovative ADM Braxon Packaging Technique Reduces Seroma in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesImmediate implant-based breast reconstruction is an established option for selected patients undergoing mastectomy. However, patients with large and ptotic breasts present specific reconstructive challenges, often requiring tailored approaches to minimize complications and optimize aesthetics. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the clinical feasibility and effectiveness of a mobile application developed to support intraoperative decision-making based on an institutional algorithm for breast reconstruction. It is also important to underline that this pilot study was exploratory in nature and primarily aimed at assessing feasibility and adherence to an app-based decision pathway, rather than comparative efficacy.
methodsWe conducted a prospective observational study from October 2023 to December 2024 at the University Hospital of Sassari. Female patients with large and ptotic breasts undergoing immediate implant-based reconstruction were included. A mobile app, developed using MIT App Inventor 2, implemented our institution's algorithm and guided surgeons through both preoperative and intraoperative decision-making. Surgical options included subpectoral, prepectoral with autologous fascial flaps, or prepectoral with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) reconstruction, depending on flap thickness and fascia integrity.
resultsSixteen patients (21 reconstructed breasts) were included. Surgical planning and execution followed app-generated recommendations in all cases, with no intraoperative deviations. Subpectoral reconstruction was performed in six patients, prepectoral with ADM in eight, and prepectoral with fascial flaps in two. The app was rated positively by all surgeons and facilitated consistent decision-making.
conclusionsThe proposed mobile application, described in this pilot study, proved to be a feasible and effective decision-support tool for implant-based breast reconstruction in patients with challenging anatomy. It standardized surgical choices, supported training, and has the potential to enhance reproducibility and safety in complex reconstructive procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.