ReviewCancers2025
The Knowledge Gap in Gut Microbiome Characterization in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Scoping Review.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesOver the past two decades, the incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EoCRC) has been increasing, although its underlying causes remain unclear. Gut microbiome is known to play a role in carcinogenesis of colorectal cancer. This scoping review aims to systematically map and synthetize current evidence on gut microbiome characterization in EoCRC (vs. late-onset colorectal cancer (LoCRC) and healthy individuals), describe the methodology used, and identify knowledge gaps to inform and guide future research.
methodsThis systematic scoping review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus between January and February 2025. Two reviewers independently screened and selected the studies. One reviewer extracted the relevant information, using an adapted version of the JBI template.
resultsSeven studies met eligibility criteria. Compared to healthy young adults, EoCRC patients had a predominance of lower α diversity, different β diversity, and greater abundance of
conclusionsThere is a lack of large, methodologically robust studies linking gut microbiota with clinicopathological, lifestyle, and tumor molecular features in EoCRC. Our review highlights critical knowledge gaps, the need for standardized methodologies, and key areas for future investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.