ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Advancements in Spinal Endoscopic Surgery: Comprehensive Techniques and Pathologies Addressed by Full Endoscopy Beyond Lumbar Disc Herniation.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Efficacy and Learning Curve of Far-Lateral Approach (FLA) in Uni-Portal Non-Coaxial Spinal Endoscopic Surgery (UNSES) in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Prospective Study.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Article
- Endoscopic-Assisted Posterior Atlantoaxial Fusion: Technical Innovation and Clinical Experience.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Article
- The Konakondla-Telfeian-Shen (KTS) Pyramid: a safe entry zone for ventral thoracic pathologies.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2026Article
- Interventional radiology management of disc herniation: a narrative review.La Radiologia medica · 2026Review
- A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes and Technical Considerations: Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Primary Spinal Tumors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression Using a Novel L-Shaped Impactor for Treating Lumbar Foraminal and Nerve Root Canal Stenosis in Elderly Patients With High Iliac Crests: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Article
- Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy combined with annulus fibrosus suturing for lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study of early clinical and radiological outcomes.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) has traditionally been employed for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Recent innovations in surgical methods and technologies have expanded its range to address other spinal pathologies, providing minimally invasive solutions with potential clinical benefits. Our review aims to summarize the applications, clinical outcomes, and limitations of ESS beyond LDH, focusing on its role in complex spinal conditions such as stenosis, thoracic disc herniation, spinal tumors, synovial cysts, and failed back surgery syndrome. A thorough review of the literature was conducted to assess and summarize the current evidence regarding ESS applications for spinal conditions beyond LDH surgery. Areas of focus included innovations in technology and technique, as well as comparisons with conventional open surgical methods. ESS shows notable potential across different spinal conditions by providing minimally invasive alternatives to traditional open surgery. Its use could be associated with reduced surgical morbidity, shorter recovery times, and improved patient outcomes. In particular, ESS is versatile in addressing both degenerative and neoplastic conditions of the spine. Despite this, challenges such as technical complexity, steep learning curves, and limited indications for certain pathologies remain as barriers to wider adoption. ESS is evolving in spine surgery, extending its utility beyond LDH surgery. While the current evidence largely supports its clinical efficacy, further studies are needed to address the present limitations and optimize its application. Future developments in surgical training and technology will likely enhance its adoption and broaden its clinical indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.