ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2025
AI-Based Predictive Models for Cardiogenic Shock in STEMI: Real-World Data for Early Risk Assessment and Prognostic Insights.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- COVID-19 and Suicide Mortality in a Population-Based Medico-Legal Registry: An Interrupted Time-Series and Changepoint Analysis from Southeast Romania.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Identifies High-Risk Suicide Profiles in a Population-Based Forensic Registry.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Predicting Critical Outcomes in Suspected Cardiopulmonary Emergencies Using Dispatch Narratives: Temporal Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in prehospital assessment of acute coronary syndrome: a scoping review.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in acute and critical care: current challenges and strategic solutions.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- The Potential of Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Sepsis: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.