ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2025
Challenges in pain management and opioid prescribing practices following traumatic injury: a focus group study with orthopedic surgeons and general practitioners.
Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ethical Challenges of Acute Pain Management: A Scoping Review.Health science reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the experiences of orthopedic surgeons and general practitioners (GPs) in providing pain management, focusing on opioid prescribing practices and follow-up care for trauma patients following orthopedic injuries.
methodsFour semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted among 18 physicians, two among GPs and two among orthopedic trauma surgeons. Each group consisted of either specialist candidates or experienced specialists. The interviews explored experiences with follow-up care for orthopedic trauma patients, pain management, including opioid use and tapering, and were thematically analyzed.
resultsFour main themes were identified: (1) Navigating post-discharge pain management, where GPs experienced problematic transfer of treatment responsibility and lack of opioid taper plans from the specialist health service. (2) A knowledge gap in pain management, with GPs reporting insufficient knowledge about opioid treatment, and orthopedic residents describing lacking systematic training in this area during specialization. (3) Changes in opioid prescribing practices over time, which had led to a self-perceived shift from liberal to restrictive prescription attitudes. (4) Unrealistic expectations of pain relief among patients were perceived by GPs and orthopedic surgeons throughout recovery. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Our findings reveal a knowledge gap in pain management, suggesting a need for enhanced education and training for GPs, both in specialization and specialist, and for orthopedic residents. This is crucial to meet the needs of trauma patients with severe orthopedic injuries and long-term pain. GPs need access to advisory support from the specialist healthcare system. These resources, including follow-up during challenging recovery phases, must be accessible to enhance patients care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.