ArticleInsect science2025
New tsetse (Glossina fuscipes fuscipes) genomes generated from wild and laboratory-reared specimens.
Article in Insect science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Comparative genomics and transcriptomics of theResearch square · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tsetse (Glossina spp.) are vectors of African trypanosomes that cause devastating human and animal African trypanosomiases. While much of the research to better understand tsetse genetics and physiology relies on colony-reared flies, these flies may not represent the genetic diversity found in natural wild populations due to their long-term captivity. To enhance the translation of colony research into field applications, we utilized Nanopore sequencing to assemble genomes for a wild-caught female Glossina fuscipes fuscipes (Gff) from northwestern Uganda and for a female Gff from a laboratory line originally sourced from the Central African Republic in 1986. The new assemblies, from the wild-caught Gff (405.98 Mb, N50: 56.86 Mb) and the laboratory-derived Gff (398.22 Mb, N50: 47.811 Mb), demonstrate near-chromosomal level contiguity, high BUSCO scores (> 99.5%), high QV scores (> 37), and over 12 345 genes. Alignments between both new genomes reveal conserved synteny with only minor structural variants in the X, 1L, 1R, 2L, and 2R tsetse chromosomes. While most orthologs (10 730) were shared between both new genomes, we identified 381 unique orthologs and a small number of highly diverged shared single-copy homologs (3.84%). These gene-set differences could represent population-level variation due to the distinct geographic origin of these flies or adaptation to colony conditions. Our new high-quality genomes, with improvements in contiguity and completeness compared to the current NCBI RefSeq Gff genome, lay the foundation for advanced tsetse research, enabling robust lab-to-field translational applications to deepen our understanding of vector biology and disease transmission dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.