ArticleSleep2026
To advance sleep science, let's study change.
Article in Sleep, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Remote Longitudinal Tracking of Sleep, Depression, and Cognition Across Early Adolescence: Protocol for a Longitudinal Observational Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Assessing sleep, cognition and overnight memory performance in neurotypically developing youth in a children's hospital.Frontiers in sleep · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sleep is critical for physical, cognitive, and mental health, but how sleep supports these domains likely fluctuates across the lifespan. While traditional observational and experimental study designs-often cross-sectional or limited (two-wave) longitudinal designs-have provided valuable insights, they fall short of capturing the dynamic nature of sleep and its effects over time. To fully understand these complex and evolving relationships, multimethod, multi-time point longitudinal designs are required. These approaches can illuminate the temporal dynamics of sleep and its outcomes, offering stronger and potentially causal conclusions. In this article, we aim to empower sleep scientists, clinicians, and trainees with research methods focused on studying change-methods that can be applied across both observational and experimental designs. To truly advance the field, it is critical to examine sleep throughout the lifespan, from infancy through older adulthood, with repeated and nuanced assessments of sleep and its related outcomes. We outline a variety of statistical analysis approaches and corresponding design considerations that support the rigorous study of change in sleep. Finally, we offer forward-looking recommendations for scientific training, research program evaluation and funding, and the development of research infrastructure and collaborations. Together, these strategies have the potential to propel the field of sleep research forward, generating richer insights and change-based conclusions. Statement of Significance As a field, we are driven by a fundamental question: does sleep temporally precede and cause changes to our physical, mental, and cognitive health? While many existing studies use cross-sectional or limited (two-wave) longitudinal designs, these approaches often fall short of capturing the full picture needed to understand the timing and impact of sleep. Encouragingly, we have the tools and methods needed to pursue this important work. In this article, we highlight statistical approaches and research designs that can help move the field forward. With thoughtful application of these methods, we can strengthen our conclusions, generate more impactful findings, and bring us closer to understanding the role of sleep across the lifespan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.