Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40509871›Full record

ArticleSleep2026

To advance sleep science, let's study change.

Katharine C Simon, Katherine A Duggan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katharine C SimonDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Katherine A DugganDepartment of Psychology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, United States.

Funding

Technical Services CoreP30GM114748 · NIGMS · NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCCOURT, MARK E. · 2016 to 2020
$5.0M
Perceived Control and Cognitive Aging: Pathways to Preserve Cognitive Functioning and Reduce Risk of Alzheimer’s Disease in Socioeconomically Diverse PopulationsR01AG075117 · NIA · NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HAMM, JEREMY · 2022 to 2025
$1.7M
The role of insufficient sleep and depression on hippocampal-dependent memory trajectories across the adolescent transitionK08HD107161 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Katharine Simon · 2022 to 2026
$798k
National Institute of General Medical Sciences at the NIH GM 114748NIA NIH HHS R01 AG075117NICHD NIH HHS K08 HD107161NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM114748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sleep is critical for physical, cognitive, and mental health, but how sleep supports these domains likely fluctuates across the lifespan. While traditional observational and experimental study designs-often cross-sectional or limited (two-wave) longitudinal designs-have provided valuable insights, they fall short of capturing the dynamic nature of sleep and its effects over time. To fully understand these complex and evolving relationships, multimethod, multi-time point longitudinal designs are required. These approaches can illuminate the temporal dynamics of sleep and its outcomes, offering stronger and potentially causal conclusions. In this article, we aim to empower sleep scientists, clinicians, and trainees with research methods focused on studying change-methods that can be applied across both observational and experimental designs. To truly advance the field, it is critical to examine sleep throughout the lifespan, from infancy through older adulthood, with repeated and nuanced assessments of sleep and its related outcomes. We outline a variety of statistical analysis approaches and corresponding design considerations that support the rigorous study of change in sleep. Finally, we offer forward-looking recommendations for scientific training, research program evaluation and funding, and the development of research infrastructure and collaborations. Together, these strategies have the potential to propel the field of sleep research forward, generating richer insights and change-based conclusions. Statement of Significance As a field, we are driven by a fundamental question: does sleep temporally precede and cause changes to our physical, mental, and cognitive health? While many existing studies use cross-sectional or limited (two-wave) longitudinal designs, these approaches often fall short of capturing the full picture needed to understand the timing and impact of sleep. Encouragingly, we have the tools and methods needed to pursue this important work. In this article, we highlight statistical approaches and research designs that can help move the field forward. With thoughtful application of these methods, we can strengthen our conclusions, generate more impactful findings, and bring us closer to understanding the role of sleep across the lifespan.

Indexed as

Research DesignSleepCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLongitudinal Studiesagingbehavioral sleep medicinecausalitydata analysislongitudinal studiesmultivariate analysispublic healthresearch designstatistics

Identifiers

PMID40509871
PMCPMC12795746

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.