SynthesisAesthetic surgery journal2025
Tranexamic Acid in Body Contouring Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Aesthetic surgery journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and Safety of Tranexamic Acid in Abdominoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- International survey on the use of tranexamic acid in plastic surgery-Current practices and perspectives.JPRAS open · 2026Article
- Systemic Administration of Tranexamic Acid Improves Postoperative Outcome in Abdominoplasty.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast and body contouring procedures are plastic surgery's most popular and effective interventions. Although these procedures are generally safe, they are not without risks and complications. Antifibrinolytic drugs such as tranexamic acid (TXA) have been used as an adjunct to improve outcomes. The authors of this meta-analysis explore the impact of TXA on complications in breast and body contouring procedures. They searched PubMed (US National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD) for studies that used TXA in standard breast reconstruction and body contouring procedures. They then performed a meta-analysis on the following complications: hematoma, seroma, infection, and wound-healing complications. A Mantel-Haenszel method random-effects model was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) within and a 95% CI for dichotomous outcomes. Subgroups were created for studies that utilized systemic (IV), topical or concurrent IV, and topical TXA administration. A total of 13 studies were selected and included in the analysis. There was a significant lower risk of hematoma (OR = 0.37; 95% CI = 0.18-077; P = .008) in the TXA cohort. There were no significant differences observed in terms of wound-healing issues or seroma formation. The subgroup analysis of this study demonstrated significantly decreased risks of infection (OR = 0.41; 95% CI = 0.22-077; P = .005) in the topical TXA cohort. In breast and body contouring procedures, the risk of hematoma and wound-healing complications can potentially be reduced by IV TXA administration. The infection risk can be potentially reduced by topical TXA administration. Level of Evidence: 3 (Therapeutic).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.