ArticleInternational journal of therapeutic massage & bodywork2025
The Prevalence of Massage Therapy Utilization for Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Systematic Review.
Article in International journal of therapeutic massage & bodywork, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrated Multiomics Analysis Reveals Manual Therapy Restores Autophagic Homeostasis via the AMPK/ULK1 Axis in Chronic Low Back Pain.Pain research & management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Massage therapy is a popular treatment for musculoskeletal conditions globally. As the efficacy for massage therapy grows over time, it is becoming a more acceptable form of therapy alongside conventional medicine. The aim of this systematic review is to highlight the prevalence of massage therapy utilization specifically for the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions. Methods: A comprehensive search of health databases using keywords mapped to massage and musculoskeletal conditions identified 38 studies. An assessment of the quality of these studies was undertaken using a validated quality appraisal instrument. Results: Overall, the prevalence of massage use ranged from 2% to 81.2%. The range narrowed marginally from 2.2% to 56% in larger studies (n ≥ 1,000). Prevalence was higher among younger individuals, ranging from 12% to 56%. The prevalence of use among women ranged from 7.7% to 56%. The highest prevalence for conditions was for lower back pain/back pain, ranging from 10.5% to 68.1%, and for patients with chronic pain, ranging from 17.6% to 56%. The lowest prevalence was reported in Australia, ranging from 2% to 56%, and the highest in North America, from 2.2% to 81.2%. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that 74% of studies in this review relating to prevalence of massage therapy utilization for musculoskeletal conditions are reported within studies focusing on complementary medicine more generally. Further studies on massage as an independent treatment modality would be useful to provide improved evidence on prevalence for massage use for musculoskeletal conditions. While the range of prevalence reported here is wide, inpatients and outpatients with specific musculoskeletal conditions including pain are high users of massage therapy. Despite the growing interest in research, there is a gap in the literature around men and their use of massage therapy. Further high-quality research in these areas will better inform the knowledge base around these participant cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.