Evidence mapPaperPMID 40510039Full record

ArticleInternational journal of therapeutic massage & bodywork2025

Combined Efficacy of Foot Reflexology and Back Massage on Pain and Fatigue in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis.

Sivakumar Chinnusamy, Arun Vijay Subbarayalu, Pradeepa Mani, Vinosh Kumar Purushothaman, Rajkumar Krishnan Vasanthi, Chittode Krishnasamy Muralidharan, Prabhakaradoss Devadoss, Balachandran Ganapathy Surulisubbiah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of therapeutic massage & bodywork, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sivakumar ChinnusamyPPG College of Physiotherapy, Affiliated to the Tamil Nadu Dr. MGR Medical University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Arun Vijay SubbarayaluDepartment of Physical Therapy, Deanship of Quality and Academic Accreditation, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Pradeepa ManiPPG College of Physiotherapy, Affiliated to the Tamil Nadu Dr. MGR Medical University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Vinosh Kumar PurushothamanFaculty of Health & Life Sciences, INTI International University, Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia.
Rajkumar Krishnan VasanthiFaculty of Health & Life Sciences, INTI International University, Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia.
Chittode Krishnasamy MuralidharanNandha College of Physiotherapy, Affiliated to the Tamil Nadu Dr. MGR Medical University, Erode, Tamil Nadu, India.
Prabhakaradoss DevadossVinayaka Mission's College of Physiotherapy, Vinayaka Mission Research Foundation (DU), Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.
Balachandran Ganapathy SurulisubbiahPhysiotherapy Department, Ganga Medical Centre and Hospitals Private Limited, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Multiple treatment modalities have been used to treat complications such as pain and fatigue in patients undergoing hemodialysis. However, the combined effectiveness of reflexology and back massage (BM) in relieving pain and fatigue in patients undergoing hemodialysis is limited and this study aims to fill this research gap. Materials and methods: A pre- and post-test experimental study design was adopted in which 60 patients (n = 60) undergoing dialysis were randomized into two groups of 30 each using a simple randomization technique. The subjects of experimental group I received foot reflexology (FR) and BM, while experimental group II received only BM. The intervention lasted 2 days per week for 4 weeks. To examine the effectiveness of the treatment both before the intervention and at the end of the fourth week, two variables were evaluated: (i) pain intensity, which was measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and (ii) fatigue experienced by patients, which was measured using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). Results: Subjects treated with FR and BM showed better reduction in VAS (mean difference: 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.299-1.834, p < 0.05) and FSS (mean difference: 6.61, 95% CI: 0.230-11.90, p < 0.05) than the subjects exposed to BM only, with a significance level of 0.05. Conclusion: The combination of FR and BM has been found to be significantly more effective than BM alone in managing the health risks of pain and fatigue in hemodialysis patients.

Indexed as

back massagefatigueFoot reflexologyhemodialysispain

Identifiers

PMID40510039
PMCPMC12140170

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.