ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
Advancing targeted therapy for colorectal cancer: harnessing ligand-directed enzyme prodrug therapy for highly specific interventions.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- UBC9 and PI3K Expression in Colorectal Cancer: Possible Prognostic Role.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Estimating the global macroeconomic impact of colorectal cancer: evidence from Global Burden of Disease 2021 and Value of a Statistical Life Year framework.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- The role of glycoproteins in autophagy and apoptosis in colorectal cancer: A scoping review.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2026Article
- Recent advances in the therapeutics and modes of action of a range of agents used to treat ulcerative colitis and related inflammatory conditions.Inflammopharmacology · 2025Review
- Microenvironment and Tumor Heterogeneity as Pharmacological Targets in Precision Oncology.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant global health burden, ranking as the third most frequently diagnosed cancer and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Current therapeutic modalities face challenges in advanced stages, including drug resistance, toxicity, and off-target effects. Ligand-Directed Enzyme Prodrug Therapy (LDEPT) has emerged as a promising strategy to address these limitations by delivering cytotoxic agents directly to tumor sites, minimizing damage to healthy tissues. LDEPT employs ligand-enzyme complexes that specifically target cancer cells, where the enzyme activates a prodrug into its cytotoxic form, enhancing precision, reducing adverse effects, and improving the therapeutic index compared to conventional chemotherapy. This review provides a detailed analysis of LDEPT's core components while highlighting recent advancements in the field. Preclinical studies demonstrate promising outcomes, and initial clinical trials validate its potential. However, challenges remain, including optimizing ligand specificity, improving stability and delivery of ligand-enzyme complexes, and mitigating immune responses that may compromise effectiveness. Integrating LDEPT with immunotherapies or conventional chemotherapies could yield synergistic effects, paving the way for more comprehensive and personalized CRC treatment strategies. Continued research and clinical validation are essential to refine these approaches and transition LDEPT from experimental studies to routine clinical practice, with the potential to transform the treatment paradigm for advanced CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.