ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2025
Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Predicting Long-Term Depression Risk in ACS Patients After PCI: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate a machine learning (ML) model for predicting long-term depression risk in ACS patients following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 1951 ACS patients who underwent PCI in 2023. Feature selection was conducted using the Boruta algorithm, and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis was applied to assess non-linear associations. Six ML models were trained and tested using a 70:30 train-validation split. Model performance was evaluated using Area under the curve(AUC), sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used to interpret feature contributions. Results: Among the 1951 patients, 382 (19.6%) developed long-term depression. After feature selection via the Boruta algorithm, ten key predictors were identified, including NYHA classification, diabetes, thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The LGBM and XGBoost models achieved the highest discrimination, with AUCs of 0.849 (training) and 0.652 (validation) for LGBM, and 0.814 (training) and 0.699 (validation) for XGBoost. Calibration curves showed good alignment between predicted and observed outcomes. SHAP analysis confirmed NYHA classification, TSH, and diabetes as the most influential features. Decision curve analysis demonstrated the clinical benefit of both models across a range of thresholds. Conclusion: The models demonstrated potential for early risk stratification of post-PCI depression and may inform targeted clinical interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.