Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40510342›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025

Diagnostic utility of IL-18 plasma levels in distinguishing abdominal from non-abdominal sepsis.

Anna Herminghaus, Mykola Totskyi, Christian Vollmer, Thomas Dimski, Timo Brandenburger, Anne Kuebart, Helen Rinderknecht, Christian B Bergmann, Ina Vernikouskaya, Jasmin Maria Bülow and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anna HerminghausDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Mykola TotskyiDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Christian VollmerDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Thomas DimskiDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Timo BrandenburgerDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Anne KuebartDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Helen RinderknechtDepartment of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Translational and Experimental Trauma Research, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
Christian B BergmannDepartment of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Translational and Experimental Trauma Research, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
Ina VernikouskayaDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
Jasmin Maria BülowDepartment of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Translational and Experimental Trauma Research, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
Nils BeckerDepartment of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Translational and Experimental Trauma Research, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
Borna ReljaDepartment of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Translational and Experimental Trauma Research, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Abdominal sepsis is a critical and high-risk condition in intensive care, characterized by diagnostic challenges, complex treatment, and high mortality. Non-specific symptoms and the difficulty of discriminating harmful bacteria from the normal flora complicate a timely diagnosis and treatment. Although timely interventions are crucial, the best timing of surgery remains uncertain, especially in unstable patients. Diagnostic markers like C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and interleukins help guide diagnosis but often lack specificity of an abdominal focus. This study aims to identify possible additional markers for earlier detection of abdominal sepsis. Methods: Plasma samples were collected from 47 sepsis patients at the day of sepsis diagnosis, and from 10 healthy controls. Patients were retrospectively categorized into those with abdominal (n=23) and those with non-abdominal (n=24) sepsis. Patient`s characteristics, clinical outcomes, physiological and laboratory parameters, and cytokine levels were assessed. Receiver operating characteristic curves and Spearman correlation analyses were conducted. Results: Age and sex proportions were comparable across the sepsis groups, as were the chronic disease prevalence, the severity of illness and mortality rates. Patients with abdominal sepsis were more likely to undergo emergency surgeries. Pro-inflammatory cytokines like IL-6, MCP-1, and IL-18 were elevated, as was the anti-inflammatory IL-10 in both sepsis cohorts compared to healthy controls. IL-18 was particularly associated with a more severe inflammatory response in non-abdominal sepsis. IL-18 levels below 1892.00 pg/mL showed 82.6% sensitivity and 56.5% specificity for identifying patients with abdominal sepsis, with a significant diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.68, p = 0.034). This suggests IL-18 as a useful additional moderate predictor for critical cases. Conclusion: The results demonstrate that IL-18, IL-6, MCP-1, and IL-10 are increased in sepsis, while IL-18 may serve as an additional biomarker for distinguishing abdominal from non-abdominal sepsis.

Indexed as

Interleukin-18SepsisAdultAgedBiomarkersDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesROC CurveBiomarkersIL18 protein, humanInterleukin-18cytokinesIL-18inflammationoutcomeprediction

Identifiers

PMID40510342
PMCPMC12159074

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.