SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Meta-analysis of the synergistic effect of traditional Chinese medicine compounds combined with conventional Western medicine in the treatment of osteoporosis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Nutritional supplementation withFrontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Targeting Ferroptosis With Natural Products for the Treatment of Skeletal System Disease: An Updated Review.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of different treatment strategies for distal radius fracture.Health economics review · 2026Article
- Osteogenic action of the natural plant material icariin and its potential use in biomedical tissue engineering.American journal of translational research · 2025Review
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of Chinese patent medicines for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2026-01-28Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Notice - Limited or No Information ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As a global public health problem, osteoporosis (OP) urgently requires better treatment strategies. This study systematically evaluated the synergistic effect of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) compounds combined with conventional Western medicine (such as bisphosphonates and calcium) compared to Western medicine alone in the treatment of OP through a meta-analysis. Methods: Based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and the Measurement Tool for Systematic Review Assessment guidelines, databases such as PubMed and Embase were systematically searched (as of March 2025), and 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), involving a total of 2,403 patients, were included. Results: The integrated Chinese and Western medicine group showed significantly higher lumbar and femoral neck Bone mineral density (BMD) growth rates than the control group, alongside reduced pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. Mechanistically, the combination therapy synergistically modulated bone turnover markers: the bone resorption marker type I collagen C-terminal peptide (CTX-1) decreased (MD = -1.33, P = 0.05), the bone formation marker osteocalcin (OC) increased (MD = 15.56, P < 0.0001), suggesting dual regulation of osteoclast inhibition (e.g., via Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-κ B Ligand (RANKL) suppression) and osteoblast activation (e.g., via Wnt/β-catenin signaling). Notably, Procollagen I N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) levels remained unchanged (P = 0.63), indicating differential targeting of bone formation pathways. Subgroup analyses revealed stronger BMD improvements with short-term interventions (3-6 months), potentially linked to early osteoclast activity suppression by TCM compounds (e.g., icariin in Xianling Gubao), whereas diminished long-term efficacy (12-24 months) may reflect adaptive bone remodeling plateaus. Fracture incidence and safety profiles did not differ between groups. Conclusion: Current evidence supports the potential of integrated TCM and Western medicine therapy in improving BMD and reducing pain. However, its clinical application requires further validation through large-scale, long-term, and standardized RCTs. Future research should focus on standardizing TCM compound ingredients, exploring the mechanisms of combined therapies, and conducting long-term safety assessments. Systematic review registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/G73SH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.