ArticleClinical kidney journal2025
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes and advanced CKD: kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in a real-world setting.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Finerenone in Cardiorenal Protection and Urine Albumin-to-Creatinine Ratio Modulation.Kidney international reports · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) Syndrome Staging and Relevance to Precision Nutrition.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Glucagon-like Peptide Receptor Agonists and Kidney Outcomes in the Era of Personalized Medicine: Focus on Albuminuria.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Association between sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor use and clinical outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes after urinary tract infection.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Article
- GLP-1 Agonists in Cardiovascular Diseases: Mechanisms, Clinical Evidence, and Emerging Therapies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The advent of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor antagonists (GLP-1 RAs) has generated significant interest in their potential cardiovascular benefits for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, they lack comprehensive evaluations of their impact on kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study aimed to evaluate the effects of GLP-1 RAs on kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with T2DM and advanced CKD. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study with a new user design that utilized propensity score matching to establish comparable groups of GLP-1 RA users and nonusers. We obtained data from 69 US healthcare organizations within the TriNetX platform from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2022. We included 632 308 patients with T2DM, aged ≥18 years, and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of ≤45 mL/min/1.73 m Results: The matched groups had a mean age of approximately 65 years, with men comprising 43% of each cohort. GLP-1 RA users exhibited a significantly lower incidence of dialysis initiation and major adverse cardiovascular events than GLP-1 RA nonusers, with respective hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.89 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85-0.93] and 0.92 (95% CI 0.88-0.95). Mortality rates were significantly reduced (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.78-0.84). Moreover, GLP-1 RA users had significant cardiovascular benefits, which were consistent across subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: GLP-1 RAs were significantly associated with the incidence of kidney and cardiovascular events in patients with T2DM and advanced CKD, suggesting the potential importance of incorporating GLP-1 RA treatment to help modify disease progression and improve survival in this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.