Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40510764›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025

Annotation of biological samples data to standard ontologies with support from large language models.

Andrea Riquelme-García, Juan Mulero-Hernández, Jesualdo Tomás Fernández-Breis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Large Language Models in Bio-Ontology Research: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrea Riquelme-GarcíaDepartamento de Informática y Sistemas, Universidad de Murcia, CEIR Campus Mare Nostrum, IMIB-Pascual Parrilla, Murcia, 30100, Spain.
Juan Mulero-HernándezDepartamento de Informática y Sistemas, Universidad de Murcia, CEIR Campus Mare Nostrum, IMIB-Pascual Parrilla, Murcia, 30100, Spain.
Jesualdo Tomás Fernández-BreisDepartamento de Informática y Sistemas, Universidad de Murcia, CEIR Campus Mare Nostrum, IMIB-Pascual Parrilla, Murcia, 30100, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The semantic integration of biological data is hindered by the vast heterogeneity of data sources and their limited semantic formalization. A crucial step in this process is mapping data elements to ontological concepts, which typically involves substantial manual effort. Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated potential in automating complex language-related tasks and may offer a solution to streamline biological data annotation. This study investigates the utility of LLMs-specifically various base and fine-tuned GPT models-for the automatic assignment of ontological identifiers to biological sample labels. We evaluated model performance in annotating labels to four widely used ontologies: the Cell Line Ontology (CLO), Cell Ontology (CL), Uber-anatomy Ontology (UBERON), and BRENDA Tissue Ontology (BTO). Our dataset was compiled from publicly available, high-quality databases containing biologically relevant sequence information, which suffers from inconsistent annotation practices, complicating integrative analyses. Model outputs were compared against annotations generated by text2term, a state-of-the-art annotation tool. The fine-tuned GPT model outperformed both the base models and text2term in annotating cell lines and cell types, particularly for the CL and UBERON ontologies, achieving a precision of 47-64% and a recall of 88-97%. In contrast, base models exhibited significantly lower performance. These results suggest that fine-tuned LLMs can accelerate and improve the accuracy of biological data annotation. Nonetheless, our evaluation highlights persistent challenges, including variable precision across ontology categories and the continued need for expert curation to ensure annotation validity.

Indexed as

BioinformaticsBiological samplesData interoperabilityGenerative AILarge language models

Identifiers

PMID40510764
PMCPMC12162076

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.