ArticleTherapeutic advances in hematology2025
The efficacy and safety of asciminib treatment in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia as a second-line or beyond second-line treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Therapeutic advances in hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are currently experiencing intolerance or lack of efficacy with previous tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and benefit from asciminib as a novel TKI. Objectives: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of asciminib as a second-line or beyond second-line treatment for patients with CML. Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources and methods: We searched four databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and EMBASE) for relevant literature from the inception of the databases to February 4, 2024. Two authors independently performed data extraction to assess the efficacy of asciminib using metrics such as the rate of major molecular response (MMR) and the safety of asciminib using the rate of adverse event (AE). We also performed a subgroup analysis based on the reason for starting asciminib. Data were analyzed using either a fixed-effects model or a random-effects model to calculate the rate of MMR and the rate of AEs. We also assessed the quality of the studies by selecting appropriate tools according to the type of included studies. Results: We included 8 studies involving a total of 691 patients. The overall MMR rate for patients with CML treated with asciminib was 46.9% (95% CI: 39.8-54.0, Conclusion: Asciminib is effective in the treatment of patients with CML, and the most common AE during treatment is thrombocytopenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.