ReviewFood science & nutrition2025
The Nutritional Significance of
Review in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Quantitative assessment of the effects of sumac (Rhus Coriaria) supplementation on cardiovascular disease risk factors: evidence from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Fungal exopolysaccharides as next-generation microbial biomaterials: molecular biosynthesis, structural architecture, and translational biomanufacturing strategies.Microbial cell factories · 2026Review
- Review
- Application of edible fungi in gut microbiota regulation.NPJ science of food · 2025Review
- Bioactive compounds of Ganoderma species: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential in cancer and metabolic disorders.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Review
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of health outcomes following diabetes risk reduction diet (DRRD).Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2025Review
- Comparing the Effects ofClinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the impact of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.