ReviewJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Enhancing Pain Management: The Role of Superior Hypogastric Plexus Block in Chronic Pelvic Pain Treatment.
Review in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a multifactorial condition characterized by persistent pain in the pelvic region, significantly impacting the quality of life and psychological wellbeing of affected individuals. The superior hypogastric plexus block (SHPB) has emerged as a promising interventional therapy for patients with refractory CPP. This procedure involves the targeted administration of anesthetic agents to the superior hypogastric plexus, a key neural network responsible for transmitting visceral pain from the pelvic organs. A thorough analysis of existing literature demonstrates that SHPB provides significant pain relief and improves functional outcomes in patients with CPP associated with conditions such as endometriosis, pelvic inflammatory disease, and malignancy-related pain. Moreover, SHPB has been shown to reduce the need for opioid analgesics and enhance the quality of life for many individuals. Despite its potential, the procedure is not without risks, including complications such as infection, bleeding, and transient hypotension. Therefore, careful patient selection and procedural expertise are paramount for optimizing outcomes. In conclusion, SHPB offers a viable and effective option for managing CPP, particularly in cases resistant to conventional therapies. Further research is warranted to establish standardized protocols, refine patient selection criteria, and assess long-term outcomes. As our understanding of CPP and its management evolves, SHPB is poised to play a pivotal role in comprehensively treating this challenging condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.