Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40511364›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2025

Real-life utilization of sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer: Patterns of practice in unmapped patients and effect on treatment and outcomes.

Danielle Glassman, Raadhika Kher, Cande V Ananth, Eugenia Girda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Danielle GlassmanDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5376-6526
Raadhika KherRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Cande V AnanthDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Eugenia GirdaDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the real-life utilization of sentinel lymph node mapping for surgical staging of patients with endometrial cancer. We evaluated patterns of surgical staging in unmapped patients and studied how this practice affected adjuvant therapies and survival. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with newly diagnosed endometrial cancer who underwent minimally invasive surgical staging, including sentinel lymph node mapping with cervical injection of indocyanine green from January 2019 to December 2021. Patient demographics, surgical findings, sentinel lymph node mapping, adjuvant therapy, and recurrence rates were collected. Sentinel lymph node detection rates were calculated, and reasons for omitting lymphadenectomy in unmapped patients were evaluated. Results: Among 121 patients, 80 (66%) had successful sentinel lymph node mapping and 41 (34%) failed mapping. Our yearly detection rate was 63%, 68%, and 70% for 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. In patients with successful sentinel lymph node mapping, 73.8% were low-grade and 26.2% were high-grade histology. For patients with failed mapping, 75.6% were low-grade and 24.4% were high-grade histology. For the failed mapping cohort, 23 patients (56.1%) had a complete lymphadenectomy performed, of which 3 (13.0%) had positive lymph nodes. Reasons for omitting lymphadenectomy were documented as: (1) intraoperative pathologic evaluation; (2) inability to tolerate Trendelenburg; (3) difficulty with anatomical dissection/visualization; and (4) evidence of locally advanced disease. There were 18 incompletely staged patients, including 8 (44.4%) with low-risk disease, 2 (11.1%) with locally advanced disease, and 1 (5.6%) with serous histology. The remaining 7 (38.9%) unstaged patients were offered and/or received adjuvant radiation based on final pathology. During a short-term follow-up period, no patients in the unmapped or incompletely staged cohorts had a recurrence of the disease. Conclusions: The rate of sentinel lymph node detection is improving. Low-risk disease identified on intraoperative pathology was the most common reason for omitting lymphadenectomy in unmapped patients, and that practice did not seem to affect adjuvant therapy or recurrence of disease.

Indexed as

Endometrial carcinomahysterectomysentinel lymph node mapping

Identifiers

PMID40511364
PMCPMC12159469

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.