ArticleESC heart failure2025
Atrial fibrillation and flutter as global drivers of heart failure: Burden and longitudinal trends over three decades.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- National Mortality Trends, Disparities, and Forecasted Burden of Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure with Underlying Ischemic Heart Disease Among Older Adults in the United States, 1999-2023.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2026Article
- Article
- Atrial fibrillation and flutter as global drivers of heart failure: Burden and longitudinal trends over three decades.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Prognostic value of alkaline phosphatase-to-albumin ratio in critically ill patients with atrial fibrillation: A MIMIC-IV retrospective study.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThe study aims to comprehensively evaluate the global burden of heart failure attributable to atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) from 1990 to 2021.
methodsUsing data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021, we estimated the prevalence and years lived with disability (YLDs) of heart failure attributable to AF/AFL across 204 countries and territories. Estimates were stratified by age, sex and socio-demographic index (SDI). Age-standardized rates per 100 000 population were calculated, and percentage changes between 1990 and 2021 were analysed to assess temporal trends.
resultsIn 2021, AF/AFL were responsible for an estimated 714 137.5 [95% uncertainty interval (UI) 520 543.5 to 940 900.6] heart failure cases and 63 942.8 (95% UI 39 057.9 to 96 196.5) YLDs globally. The age-standardized prevalence and YLD rates were 8.85 (95% UI 6.38 to 11.63) and 0.79 (95% UI 0.49 to 1.19) per 100 000 population, respectively. Between 1990 and 2021, global absolute numbers of heart failure cases and YLDs attributable to AF/AFL increased by 339.3% (95% UI 292.7 to 387.0) and 337.5% (95% UI 290.1 to 387.0), respectively. Age-standardized prevalence and YLD rates increased by 65.2% (95% UI 47.7 to 83.8) and 65.4% (95% UI 46.6 to 83.5), respectively. The burden progressively increased with age, peaking among individuals aged ≥95 years. Females experienced a higher burden than males from age 55 years onward, with the greatest disparity observed in the 85-89 years age group. High SDI regions, such as Australasia and Western Europe, exhibited the highest prevalence and YLD rates.
conclusionsThe global burden of heart failure attributable to AF/AFL increased substantially from 1990 to 2021, disproportionately affecting older adults, females aged 55 years and above and populations in high SDI regions. These findings highlight the urgent need for targeted interventions and resource allocation to address the growing challenges, particularly for vulnerable groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.