ArticleAustralasian journal on ageing2025
First steps in co-designing an online patient decision support tool for enhanced medication management in older people.
Article in Australasian journal on ageing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Deprescribing decisions in palliative care: a qualitative meta-synthesis of multi-stakeholder experiences and influencing factors.BMC palliative care · 2026Pooled it
- Human-centred design of digital health dashboards in care of older adults: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2026Article
- First steps in co-designing an online patient decision support tool for enhanced medication management in older people.Australasian journal on ageing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop a preliminary version (minimum viable product [MVP]) of an online medication management patient decision support for older people informed by a stakeholder committee (SC).
methodsA SC comprising of consumers, health-care practitioners and researchers was recruited to inform the development of the MVP. The SC met via videoconferencing, individually or in groups, with investigators to provide guidance and advice on the design and features of the MVP. Brief content analysis was performed on data extracted from video-recorded meetings, meeting minutes, notes and email correspondence to inform the MVP development.
resultsThe SC comprised two older people, one carer, pharmacist, nurse, geriatrician, general practitioner and two digital health researchers (n = 9) from three Australian states. In collaboration with the SC, an MVP called My Medicine Goals (mymedicinegoals.com) was developed for older people. It supports consumers to document and update their medicines list; identify, plan and communicate goals of care; and provides a medicines information resource hub. Other tools include interactive versions of the revised Patient's Attitudes Towards Deprescribing questionnaire and self-assessment of medication risks.
conclusionsThis project presents an approach empowering older people and carers to play active roles in co-design research to develop relevant and impactful online patient-facing health-care applications for older people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.