Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40511600›Full record

ArticleAustralasian journal on ageing2025

First steps in co-designing an online patient decision support tool for enhanced medication management in older people.

Temitope Esther Afolabi, Sarah N Hilmer, Christopher Etherton-Beer, Lisa Kouladjian O'Donnell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australasian journal on ageing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Temitope Esther AfolabiLaboratory of Ageing and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Kolling Institute, The University of Sydney and the Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0557-2337
Sarah N HilmerLaboratory of Ageing and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Kolling Institute, The University of Sydney and the Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Christopher Etherton-BeerSchool of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5148-0188
Lisa Kouladjian O'DonnellLaboratory of Ageing and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Kolling Institute, The University of Sydney and the Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop a preliminary version (minimum viable product [MVP]) of an online medication management patient decision support for older people informed by a stakeholder committee (SC).

methodsA SC comprising of consumers, health-care practitioners and researchers was recruited to inform the development of the MVP. The SC met via videoconferencing, individually or in groups, with investigators to provide guidance and advice on the design and features of the MVP. Brief content analysis was performed on data extracted from video-recorded meetings, meeting minutes, notes and email correspondence to inform the MVP development.

resultsThe SC comprised two older people, one carer, pharmacist, nurse, geriatrician, general practitioner and two digital health researchers (n = 9) from three Australian states. In collaboration with the SC, an MVP called My Medicine Goals (mymedicinegoals.com) was developed for older people. It supports consumers to document and update their medicines list; identify, plan and communicate goals of care; and provides a medicines information resource hub. Other tools include interactive versions of the revised Patient's Attitudes Towards Deprescribing questionnaire and self-assessment of medication risks.

conclusionsThis project presents an approach empowering older people and carers to play active roles in co-design research to develop relevant and impactful online patient-facing health-care applications for older people.

Indexed as

AgingDecision Support TechniquesInternetMedication Therapy ManagementAgedAge FactorsFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMalePatient ParticipationStakeholder ParticipationVideoconferencingageingco‐designhealth technologypatient decision supportsteering committee

Identifiers

PMID40511600
PMCPMC12163865

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.