Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40512833›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

BI-SENT: bilingual aspect-based sentiment analysis of COVID-19 Tweets in Urdu language.

Ehtesham Hashmi, Amna Altaf, Muhammad Waqas Anwar, Muhammad Hasan Jamal, Usama Ijaz Bajwa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ehtesham HashmiDepartment of Information Security and Communication Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Innlandet, Norway.ORCID 0009-0000-2526-9899
Amna AltafDepartment of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad Waqas AnwarDepartment of Computer Science, Government College University Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad Hasan JamalDepartment of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-0114-0887
Usama Ijaz BajwaDepartment of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Lahore, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in over 600 million cases worldwide, and significantly impacted both physical and mental health, fostering widespread anxiety and fear. Consequently, the extensive use of online social networks to express emotions made sentiment analysis a crucial tool for understanding public sentiment. Traditionally, sentiment analysis in the Urdu language has focused on sentence-level analysis. However, aspect-level sentiment analysis is increasingly important and remains underexplored due to the challenges of the costly and time-consuming manual dataset annotation process. This study presents an innovative bilingual aspect-based sentiment analysis for Urdu and Roman Urdu using unsupervised methods. For Urdu, a syntactic rule-based approach achieves an accuracy of 83% in extracting aspect terms, marking a 5% improvement in F1-score over existing methods. For Roman Urdu, the study employs collocation patterns and topic modeling to identify and categorize key aspects, resulting in a perplexity score of -7 and a coherence score of 41. The results not only demonstrate the semantic coherence of the identified categories but also represent a significant advancement in aspect-level sentiment analysis by eliminating the need for manual annotation. This study offers new insights into the sentiments expressed during the pandemic, providing valuable feedback for policymakers and health organizations.

Indexed as

COVID-19MultilingualismSocial MediaEmotionsHumansLanguagePandemicsSARS-CoV-2Semantics

Identifiers

PMID40512833
PMCPMC12165425

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.