Evidence mapPaperPMID 40513010Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2025

Determinants of Patient Use of Telemental Health Services: Representative Cross-Sectional Survey From Germany.

Ariana Neumann, Hans-Helmut König, André Hajek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ariana NeumannDepartment of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany, 49 40741054202, 49 4074104026.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8746-0330
Hans-Helmut KönigDepartment of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany, 49 40741054202, 49 4074104026.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5711-6862
André HajekDepartment of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany, 49 40741054202, 49 4074104026.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6886-2745

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Telemental health services effectively address major challenges in mental health care delivery. To maximize the potential of the services, it is essential to facilitate patient use and reduce use disparities. Nevertheless, determinants of patient use of telemental health services have been scarcely investigated thus far. Objective: We aimed to identify determinants of patient use of telemental health services since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and in the last 4 weeks. Methods: In December 2023, we conducted a cross-sectional, quota-based (gender and age group) online survey. The sample comprised individuals aged 18 to 74 years, who had been using mental health services since March 2020 (n=2082). Telemental health service use was assessed using items that inquired whether individuals had used the services since March 2020 or currently (in the last 4 weeks). Logistic regressions were computed to test the associations of socioeconomic, access, health, COVID-19-related, psychosocial, and service factors, as well as personality and provider characteristics with patient use. Results: Younger age, a more positive patient attitude toward telemental health services, a more positive provider attitude toward using the services, and higher provider skills for using the services were positively associated with patient use of telemental health services since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. When exclusively looking at current use, positive associations with full-time employment, lower neuroticism, a more positive provider attitude toward the services, and use of the services to avoid stigmatization, long waiting times, or inconvenient scheduling were observed. Access, health, and COVID-19-related factors were not associated with patient use (since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and currently). Conclusions: Beyond socioeconomic factors, personality, and a positive patient attitude toward the services, patient use of telemental health services was associated with a positive provider attitude toward using the services and higher provider skills for using the services, which underscores the need for provider support and training in telemental health care. Furthermore, avoiding stigmatization and higher convenience of the services were associated with patient use, which highlights the substantial potential of the services to address current mental health care challenges.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental Health ServicesPatient Acceptance of Health CareTelemedicineAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMental Health TeletherapyMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2digital healthpatient useservice usetelemedicinetelemental healthtelepsychiatryteletherapy

Identifiers

PMID40513010
PMCPMC12180686

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.