Evidence mapPaperPMID 40513657Full record

ReviewJournal of advanced research2026

Advancements in bone organoids: perspectives on construction methodologies and application strategies.

Shuo Huang, Yufei Wu, Hui Zhao, Ke Song, Yan Liu, Jing Mao, Qilin Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of advanced research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bone organoids and mitochondrial reprogramming.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Bone Organoids: A Novel Tool for Modeling and Managing Skeletal Disorders in Diabetes.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shuo HuangDepartment of Stomatology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, PR China; School of Stomatology, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, PR China; Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Oral and Maxillofacial Development and Regeneration, Wuhan 430022, PR China.
Yufei WuState Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, PR China.
Hui ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, PR China.
Ke SongDepartment of Stomatology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, PR China; School of Stomatology, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, PR China; Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Oral and Maxillofacial Development and Regeneration, Wuhan 430022, PR China.
Yan LiuCentral Laboratory, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry Ministry of Health & NMPA Key Laboratory for Dental Materials & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices, Beijing 100081, PR China. Electronic address: orthoyan@bjmu.edu.cn.
Jing MaoDepartment of Stomatology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, PR China; School of Stomatology, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, PR China; Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Oral and Maxillofacial Development and Regeneration, Wuhan 430022, PR China. Electronic address: maojing@hust.edu.cn.
Qilin LiDepartment of Stomatology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, PR China; School of Stomatology, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, PR China; Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Oral and Maxillofacial Development and Regeneration, Wuhan 430022, PR China. Electronic address: qilinli@tjh.tjmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn clinical practice and research, bone defects due to tumor growth, trauma, and different pathological conditions are significant challenges. Although bone possesses an intrinsic capacity for regeneration, extensive bone abnormalities necessitate applying advanced methods for regenerating bone. Bone organoids have made methodological breakthroughs in this field, and the use of bone organoids to repair bone defects has gained wide acceptance in the scientific community, supported by a large body of experimental evidence. AIM OF REVIEW: This review synthesizes existing literature and ground-breaking studies to provide an in-depth examination of the bone organoid model, exploring the fundamental architecture and development of bone and emphasizing recent advancements in bone organoid fabrication, such as the application of 3D bioprinting technology in bone organoid fabrication. Furthermore, the study suggests potential directions for future research, highlighting the critical role of interdisciplinary collaboration in fully harnessing the potential of this rapidly evolving field. Key scientific concepts of review Bone organoids involve the 3D self-organization of in vitro-cultured bone-associated stem cells, optionally including extracellular matrix components. This process generates tissue closely resembling the original bone tissue's functional, genetic, and structural features. Bone organoids are more promising than traditional methods of bone defect repair. In addition, tissue engineering technologies such as 3D bioprinting have opened up new opportunities for constructing bone organoids. Future research should prioritize the development of composite bone organoids, enhancement of bone organoid stiffness, and improvement of bioactive materials, as well as the exploration and development of novel bioinks to facilitate the application of bone organoids in bone repair and regeneration.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesBone RegenerationOrganoidsTissue EngineeringAnimalsBioprintingHumansPrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue Scaffolds3D bioprintingBone organoidsBone regenerationiPSCsOrganoids

Identifiers

PMID40513657
PMCPMC12957805

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.