ReviewPhysiology & behavior2025
"The Big Three" properties of food that drive intake.
Review in Physiology & behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Plate Clearing and Body Mass Index: A Meta-Analysis.Obesity science & practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Much of the interest in studying human eating behavior stems from a desire to characterize properties of foods that affect consumption, with the goal of leveraging influential properties to moderate energy intake. We propose that established determinants of intake include "The Big Three": portion size, energy density, and variety. Over the past several decades, multiple studies have demonstrated a causal relationship between portion size and intake across different participants, settings, and contexts. The robust effect of portion size can be leveraged to moderate intake by increasing the proportion of low-energy-dense dietary components available. Among "The Big Three", energy density likely plays the most dominant role. Even small reductions in energy density, such as increasing the water content of foods, can lead to reductions in energy intake, and, over time, body weight. In addition, increased food variety can delay satiation by countering the relative hedonic decline of a food as it is consumed (sensory-specific satiety). As a result, exposure to a greater variety of foods increases intake, especially when the sensory properties of the foods served differ from one another. "The Big Three" characterize the current food environment, which is filled with a wide variety of food options, many of which are energy-dense and large in portion size. This review covers early studies assessing the effects of these three food properties on satiation, introduces recent studies, and discusses how this understanding can be applied to moderating energy intake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.