ArticleCommunications medicine2025
Pretrained patient trajectories for adverse drug event prediction using common data model-based electronic health records.
Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety Monitoring of High-Risk Antibiotics Using Artificial Intelligence: A Narrative Review with Focus on Real-World Evidence.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Foundation models in healthcare: a comprehensive review from technical advances to clinical translation.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Prediction of antibiotic-associated cutaneous adverse drug reactions using electronic health record foundation models.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPretraining electronic health record (EHR) data using language models has enhanced performance across various medical tasks. Despite the potential of EHR pretraining models, predicting adverse drug events (ADEs) using EHR pretraining models has not been explored.
methodsWe used observational medical outcomes partnership common data model (CDM)-based EHR data from Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH) between January 2001 and December 2023 and Ajou University Medical Center (AUMC) between January 2004 and December 2023. In total 510,879 and 419,505 adult inpatients from SNUH and AUMC are included in internal and external datasets. For pretraining, the model was trained to infer randomly masked tokens using preceding and following history. In this process, we introduced domain embedding (DE) to provide information about the domain of masked tokens, preventing the model from finding codes from irrelevant domains. For qualitative analysis, we identified important features using the attention matrix from each finetuned model.
resultsHere we show that EHR pretraining models with DE outperform the models without pretraining and DE in predicting various ADEs, with the average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.958 and 0.964 in internal and external validations, respectively. For feature importance analysis, we demonstrate that the results are consistent with priorly reported background clinical knowledge. In addition to cohort-level interpretation, patient-level interpretation is also available.
conclusionsThe CDM-based EHR pretraining model with DE can improve prediction performance for various ADEs and can provide proper explanation at cohort and patient level. Our model has the potential to serve as a foundation model due to its strong prediction performance, interpretability, and compatibility.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.