Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40514456›Full record

ReviewHerz2025

[Bariatric surgery versus GLP-1 and dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonists : Effects on weight, risk factors and prognosis].

Jürgen Ordemann, Ulf Elbelt

Abstract readReviewComparative StudyEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Herz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jürgen OrdemannBerliner Adipositas Zentrum, Vivantes Berlin, Neue Bergstraße 6, 13585, Berlin, Deutschland. juergen.ordemann@vivantes.de.
Ulf ElbeltSchwerpunkt Endokrinologie/Diabetologie, Medizinische Klinik B, Universitätsklinikum Ruppin-Brandenburg, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To overcome the increasing prevalence of obesity and associated secondary diseases, effective treatment strategies are required. While bariatric surgery (BS) is an established method for significant and sustainable weight reduction, drug treatment with glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), GLP‑1 receptor agonists (GLP‑1 RA) and dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP)/GLP‑1 RA has gained increasing importance in recent years. This article highlights the effects of these both treatment approaches on body weight, cardiometabolic risk factors and long-term prognosis, particularly with respect to cardiovascular events and remission of type 2 diabetes. While BS shows more robust weight loss and greater improvement in metabolic parameters, GLP‑1 RA and dual GIP/GLP‑1 RA offer a conservative treatment alternative with a good safety profile. The choice of treatment should be individualized based on the patient risk profile and preferences.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Gastric Inhibitory PolypeptideGlucagon-Like Peptide 1Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsObesityEvidence-Based MedicineHumansPrognosisRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeWeight LossGastric Inhibitory PolypeptideGlucagon-Like Peptide 1Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsBariatric surgeryCardiovascular eventsDrug therapyObesityWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID40514456

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.