SynthesisWorld journal of surgical oncology2025
Impact of serum lipids on prognosis in breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in World journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vasculogenic mimicry and breast cancer prognosis: Insights into predictive model development.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Exploration of propionate metabolism-related genes to predict prognosis and immunotherapy response in ovarian cancer.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeWhether serum lipids have an impact on breast cancer(BC) prognosis remains controversial and unstudied. We conducted this systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis (MA) to explore the impact of levels of various components of the lipid profile on multiple survival outcomes (OSs) of BC.
methodsWe searched Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for relevant cohort studies to assess the impact of multiple lipids on the prognosis of BC patients. Included studies were subjected to quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). MA of extracted data was performed using StataSE 15.1.
results17 studies in total were included, involving a sample size of 24,026. MA showed that high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C ) (HR (hazard ratios) = 1.96, 95% confidence interva (CI): 1.03-3.73), apolipoprotein E (ApoE) (HR = 3.68, 95% CI: 1.71-7.94), and apolipoprotein B (ApoB) (HR = 1.93, 95% CI: 1.44-2.59) were associated with poorer OS, while high levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (HR = 0.81, 95% CI. 0.74-0.88) and apolipoprotein D (ApoD) (HR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.24-0.81) were associated with better OS. Both a high level of total cholesterol (TC) (HR = 1.60, 95% CI:1.08-2.37) and dyslipidemia (HR = 1.71, 95% CI:1.12-2.62) had a negative impact on disease-free survival (DFS) in BC patients.
conclusionThis MA showed that the levels of LDL-C, ApoE, and ApoB in serum were associated with OS, and the TC level in serum and dyslipidemia were associated with DFS. However, the levels of blood lipids were less associated with other prognostic outcomes. Other high-quality studies are needed to further elucidate this issue. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42024541755.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.