Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40515710›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2025

Use of cognitive screening among older adults who care for people with dementia: a national survey.

Ying Liu, Wei Ye, Soeren Mattke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ying LiuThe USC Brain Health Observatory, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Wei YeThe USC Brain Health Observatory, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Soeren MattkeThe USC Brain Health Observatory, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States.

Funding

Enhancing engagement and participation of marginalized community residents in the UASU01AG077280 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Arie Kapteyn · 2023 to 2026
$50.9M
UAS-CLEAR: A new nationally representative longitudinal study of caregiving experiences and well-being across the lifecourseR01AG083097 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Marco Angrisani, KIRA S BIRDITT · 2023 to 2026
$3.8M
Policy options to improve access to memory care for disadvantaged individuals who are dually eligible for Medicare and MedicaidR01AG083189 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Soeren Mattke · 2023 to 2026
$2.3M
Center for Economic and Social ResearchNational Institute of AgingNIA NIH HHS R01 AG083097NIA NIH HHS R01 AG083189NIA NIH HHS U01 AG077280NIH HHS 1R01AG083097NIH HHS 1R01AG083189NIH HHS 1U01AG077280Understanding America StudyUniversity of Southern California
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesOlder adults caring for people with dementia experience substantial burden and bear higher risk of cognitive decline themselves. Little is known on their uptake of cognitive screening. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsBetween December 19, 2023, and February 28, 2024, US residents aged 65+ from a nationally representative, probability-based internet panel were surveyed on their experience with cognitive screening in the past 12 months. Self-reported caregiving status, including the health conditions of the care recipients, was collected between 2011 and 2023. Multivariable logistic regression examined the association between the probability of taking a cognitive test and the caregiver status (dementia caregiver, non-dementia caregiver, or non--caregiver), after accounting for the demographics, whether having subjective memory concerns, and whether having a usual source of care.

resultsAmong the 2,272 participants (74% of eligibles), 19.7% reported having undergone a cognitive test during a doctor's visit: 25.2% of dementia caregivers, 19.2% of non-dementia caregivers, and 19.1% of non-caregivers. After regression adjustment, dementia caregivers had a 6 percentage points higher rate of screening (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.01, 2.07), whereas no difference was found between non-dementia caregivers and non-caregivers (AOR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.82, 1.30). DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: This study provides evidence that older dementia caregivers are significantly but only marginally more likely to undergo cognitive screening than their non-dementia caregiver and non-caregiver counterparts, despite their increased risk of cognitive impairment. These findings call for attention to this potential gap in care, and interventions to address the barriers faced by older dementia caregivers.

Indexed as

CaregiversCognitive DysfunctionDementiaMass ScreeningAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesAlzheimer’s disease and related dementiascaregivercognitive assessmenthealthcare utilization

Identifiers

PMID40515710
PMCPMC12319532

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.