Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40515808›Full record

ArticleGeroScience2026

Synaptic pruning genes networks in Alzheimer's disease: correlations with neuropathology and cognitive decline.

Cristina Sanfilippo, Paola Castrogiovanni, Rosa Imbesi, Paolo Fagone, Grazia Scuderi, Manlio Vinciguerra, Michelino Di Rosa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cristina SanfilippoNeurologic Unit, AOU "Policlinico-San Marco", Department of Medical, Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, GF, Ingrassia, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia N.78, 95100, Catania, Sicily, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7812-1564
Paola CastrogiovanniDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Human Anatomy and Histology Section, School of Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5873-2456
Rosa ImbesiDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Human Anatomy and Histology Section, School of Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4228-4163
Paolo FagoneDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6694-1992
Grazia ScuderiDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Manlio VinciguerraDepartment of Translational Stem Cell Biology, Research Institute, Medical University Varna, Varna, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-1768-3894
Michelino Di RosaDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Human Anatomy and Histology Section, School of Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy. chitotriosidase@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1837-9325

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synaptic pruning (SP) is a critical process in brain development and maintenance, essential for refining neural circuits by eliminating weak or redundant synapses. Dysregulation of SP has been implicated in neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD). Studying the regulation of SP genes across the lifespan and their variation by sex and age is crucial to understanding the interplay between aging, sex, and AD pathogenesis. This study comprehensively analyzes the expression of SP-related genes, including complement system components (C1QA, C1QB, C1QC, C1S, C1R, C3), microglial regulators (ITGB2, ITGAM), and astrocytic factors (MERTK, MEGF10), as well as synaptic protective signals (CD47, SIRPA) in 2294 non-demented healthy controls (NDHC) and 1555 AD patients, stratified by sex, age, and brain area. Our findings reveal significant upregulation of most SP-related genes in AD brains, except for CD47 and SIRPA. Sex-specific patterns emerged, with males exhibiting stronger associations between complement genes and AD pathology, compared to females. Notably, in NDHC, females displayed higher baseline expression of SP-related genes (except CD47), but these sex differences diminished in AD, indicating disease-driven convergence. Age-related dynamics further highlighted distinct profiles, with males showing progressive upregulation of SP genes in NDHC, whereas females exhibited early senescence-like suppression followed by late-life compensatory changes. In AD, males demonstrated early complement dysregulation, while females displayed a pronounced inflammatory shift in advanced age. Region-specific analyses revealed heterogeneity, with the diencephalon showing the highest gene expression in NDHC males, while AD flattened regional differences in males but amplified variability in females. Correlation analyses linked complement and microglial genes to amyloid and tau pathology, with sex-specific associations. Principal component analysis (PCA) and Gene Ontology (GO) highlighted disrupted coordination between microglia, astrocytes, and neurons in AD. Protein expression analysis using the Human Protein Atlas revealed sex-specific differences in the localization of complement and microglial proteins in the prefrontal cortex. These findings underscore the complex interplay of sex, age, and regional factors in SP regulation, implicating complement overactivation, microglial dysfunction, and astrocytic phagocytosis in AD pathogenesis.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionGene Regulatory NetworksNeuronal PlasticityAgedAged, 80 and overBrainCase-Control StudiesComplement System ProteinsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSex FactorsComplement System ProteinsAlzheimer’s diseaseAstrocytesComplement systemMicrogliaSynaptic pruning

Identifiers

PMID40515808
PMCPMC12972422

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.