ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2025
'Intelligent' proteins.
Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sarcolipin is a Conformation-Dependent Regulator of the Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Calcium Pump SERCA.The Journal of membrane biology · 2026Article
- Modulation of Network Plasticity Opens Novel Therapeutic Possibilities in Cancer, Diabetes, and Neurodegeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Structural-Scaling Transitions and Criticality Cascade in DNA with Open States.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- In Silico Investigation of Phytochemicals From Clinically Tested Herbal Extracts as Potential Dihydrofolate Reductase Inhibitors for Buruli Ulcer.BioMed research international · 2025Article
- Agrochemical innovation for crop health: moving forward through dynamic disorder.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present an idea of protein molecules that challenges the traditional view of proteins as simple molecular machines and suggests instead that they exhibit a basic form of "intelligence". The idea stems from suggestions coming from Integrated Information Theory (IIT), network theory, and allostery to explore how proteins process information, adapt to their environment, and even show memory-like behaviors. We define protein intelligence using IIT and focus on how proteins integrate information (in terms of the parameter Φ coming from IIT) and balance their core (stable, ordered regions) and periphery (flexible, disordered regions). This balance allows proteins to remain stable while adapting to changes and operating in a critical state where order and disorder coexist. We summarize recent findings on conformational memory, allosteric regulation, protein intrinsic disorder, liquid-liquid phase separation, and critical transitions, and compare protein behavior to other complex systems like ecosystems and neural networks. While our perspective offers a unified framework to understand proteins, it also raises questions about applying intelligence concepts to molecular systems. We discuss how this understanding could advance protein engineering, drug design, and synthetic biology, while at the same time acknowledging the challenges of creating adaptive, "intelligent" proteins. This concept bridges the gap between mechanistic and systems-level views of proteins and offers a comprehensive understanding of their dynamic and adaptive nature. We have tried to redefine the traditionally metaphorical concept of "intelligence" in biochemistry as a measurable property while simultaneously establishing the material foundation of protein intelligence through the identification of fundamental elements such as memory and learning in molecular systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.