ReviewNutrition & diabetes2025
Sex-specific differences of advanced glycation end products in diabetes.
Review in Nutrition & diabetes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Triglyceride-glucose index and its derivatives as emerging biomarkers of insulin resistance for prognostic evaluation of cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome: mechanisms and clinical applications.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Identification of potentially inappropriate medications characteristic of older individuals with diabetes: a study using pharmacy claims data.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) are formed through non-enzymatic glycation reactions and accumulate in tissues, particularly under pathological conditions such as diabetes mellitus. These compounds are linked to the progression of diabetic complications, including nephropathy, retinopathy, and cardiovascular disease, through mechanisms such as oxidative stress and chronic inflammation. Emerging evidence suggests significant sex-specific differences in AGE formation, accumulation, and their biological effects, influenced by hormonal variations, dietary patterns, and metabolic differences. While the underlying biochemistry of AGE formation, such as the Maillard reaction and dicarbonyl compound activity, is well-characterized, the implications of these processes for clinical outcomes remain underexplored. This mini-review highlights the interplay between molecular mechanisms and sex-specific factors in AGE-related pathophysiology. It further discusses potential therapeutic approaches targeting AGE formation and receptor-mediated pathways, emphasizing the importance of integrating sex-specific considerations into diabetes management. Bridging molecular insights with clinical practice could advance personalized treatment strategies for diabetic complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.