ArticleRadiological physics and technology2025
Predicting perceived exertion during high-intensity exercise using quantitative MRI: insights from T2* value and muscle cross-sectional area.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations between MR Imaging-derived Metrics under Exercise Load, Wingate Test Results, and Sprint Performance.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026Article
- Lumbar paraspinal muscles in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain and the effect of exercise: comparative and interventional study.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimedto investigate the relationship between MRI-derived skeletal muscle biomarkers and subjective exercise intensity, measured by the Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE). Both T2* value and CSA showed significant time-dependent changes following exercise. The percent change (PC) in T2* immediately after exercise (T2* PC-post/pre) was most strongly associated with RPE (ρ = 0.45,p < 0.01), while CSA showed a weaker correlation. Muscle strength was not significantly associated with RPE.Random forest analysis identified T2* PC-post/pre as the most important predictor of RPE, supported by partial dependence plots showing a nonlinear increase in RPE with higher T2* value changes. T2* value changes after exercise reflect metabolic stress and serve as a more specific predictor of RPE than CSA or muscle strength. These findings highlight the potential of T2* value as a non-invasive biomarker for assessing subjective exercise intensity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40518471What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.