Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40518680›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of laboratory hematology2026

Molecular Testing in Sickle Cell Disease: From Newborn Screening to Transfusion Care.

Thomas Pincez, Yves D Pastore

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of laboratory hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas PincezDivision of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9412-333X
Yves D PastoreDivision of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is one of the most frequent monogenic diseases worldwide and a highly heterogeneous and complex disease. SCD care carries several challenges. This includes early and accurate diagnosis as well as optimal red blood cell transfusion matching in this population carrying a high risk of alloimmunization. For decades, molecular biology has used hemoglobin and SCD as models for the development of several molecular tools. Such tools can now be used for various aspects of SCD care. Molecular diagnosis is notably the root of noninvasive prenatal testing. In postnatal diagnosis, including newborn screening, molecular approaches can overcome several limitations of protein-based methods. Simple approaches such as polymerase chain reaction can be used as a high-throughput and low-cost screening test. Moreover, combining sequence and deletion analyses allows for a comprehensive study of the β-globin locus, resolving complex cases. In transfusion care, genotyping for blood group determination has been shown to be more accurate compared to protein-based serological testing. Future development of molecular testing in SCD includes their use as prognostic tools and recent molecular diagnosis approaches. However, despite carrying major advantages, molecular testing may also present some limitations, such as high cost, limited accessibility in many countries, and limited information using targeted approaches. Molecular testing has a different pattern of advantages and limitations than protein-based analyses. Therefore, the optimal use of molecular testing is frequently not as a standalone approach but in combination with protein-based techniques. The optimal combination depends on the resources available and the clinical challenge, to ultimately improve SCD care.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellBlood TransfusionNeonatal ScreeningHumansInfant, Newbornalloimmunizationmolecular testingnewborn screeningsickle cell diseasetransfusion care

Identifiers

PMID40518680
PMCPMC12956492

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.