Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40519409›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Safety and Functional Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Latitud™ Total Hip Replacement System in Patients With Hip Fracture.

Ponnanna Machaiah, Supreet Bajwa, Ravi Teja Rudraraju, Kunal Aneja, Nitesh Tandiya, Shakir Kapadia, Narendra Parmar, Ashish Singh, Yogesh Chaudhari, Rashid Hasan and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ponnanna MachaiahOrthopaedics, Ramaiah Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore, IND.
Supreet BajwaOrthopaedics, Wockhardt Hospital, Mumbai Central, Mumbai, IND.
Ravi Teja RudrarajuOrthopaedics, Apollo Hospitals, Hyderabad, IND.
Kunal AnejaOrthopaedics, Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, IND.
Nitesh TandiyaOrthopaedics, Barod Hospital, Indore, IND.
Shakir KapadiaOrthopaedics, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai, IND.
Narendra ParmarOrthopaedics, Yashfeen Hospital, Navsari, IND.
Ashish SinghOrthopaedics, Anup Institute of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Patna, IND.
Yogesh ChaudhariOrthopaedics, Ashoka Medicover Hospital, Nashik, IND.
Rashid HasanOrthopaedics, Bombay Hospital, Indore, IND.
Vinod AroraOrthopaedics, Medi-Square Hospital and Research Centre, Indore, IND.
Shubh MehrotraOrthopaedics, Lovee Shubh Clinic Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow, IND.
Shailendra PatilOrthopaedics, Currae Hospital, Thane, IND.
Ashok Kumar ThakkarClinical Research and Medical Writing, Meril Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Vapi, IND.
Udita ChandraClinical Research and Medical Writing, Meril Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Vapi, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Hip fractures, particularly among the aging population, present a significant burden due to their association with morbidity, mortality, and long-term disability. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasingly being adopted for fracture management in active patients, but implant performance data in real-world Indian settings remain sparse. This study assesses the early clinical efficacy, functional outcomes, and implant survivorship of the Latitud™ total hip replacement system (HRS) (Meril Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Vapi, India), a novel prosthesis designed and manufactured in India, in patients undergoing THA for hip fractures. Methods This post hoc analysis derives from a prospective, multi-center, post-marketing surveillance study conducted across 11 tertiary care centers in India. A total of 44 adult patients presenting with various fracture patterns, including femoral neck, femoral head, intertrochanteric, sub-capital, and head-neck fractures, were evaluated following THA using the Latitud™ HRS. The primary objectives of the study were implant survivorship and adverse events over a two-year follow-up period, whereas the secondary objective of the study was to assess functional outcomes using the Harris hip score (HHS) and Oxford hip score (OHS) at six weeks, six months, one year, and two years postoperatively. Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for statistical comparisons, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results A total of 44 patients were identified with the following fracture types: femoral neck (n = 18), femoral head (n = 8), head-neck (n = 2), and hip fractures (n = 12), with one case each of intertrochanteric, subcapital, intracapsular neck of femur (ICNF), and neck of femur fractures due to fall at home. Functional outcomes significantly improved, with the mean HHS increasing from 9.19 ± 9.52 preoperatively to 89.61 ± 3.57 (p < 0.0001), and the OHS from 4.89 ± 4.41 to 44.89 ± 3.77 (p < 0.0001). No serious adverse events were observed apart from the isolated revision case. At two years, implant survivorship was 97.7%, with a single revision due to polyethylene liner fracture. No other major complications, including infections, dislocations, or periprosthetic fractures, were reported. Conclusion The Latitud™ HRS demonstrated excellent short-term survivorship and marked functional improvement in patients with hip fractures, with minimal complications. These findings support its safety and effectiveness in the Indian clinical context and suggest its potential as a reliable implant for fracture-related THA. Further large-scale, long-term comparative studies are warranted to confirm these outcomes.

Indexed as

harris hip scorehip fractureimplant survivorshiplatitud total hip replacement systemoxford hip scorerevision ratestotal hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID40519409
PMCPMC12166103

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.