ReviewCureus2025
Systemic Risks of Topical Anesthetics in Barrier-Compromised Dermatologic Patients.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thermocautery for infantile circumcision in high-volume hospitals: a retrospective analysis of over 1,500 cases.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of Compound Chamomile-Lidocaine Gel for postoperative wound management after pediatric circumcision: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Lidocaine Injection Provides Superior Pain Relief Compared to 10-Minute BLT Topical Numbing in Women Undergoing Cannula-Based Aesthetic Procedures.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Article
- Risk-Stratified Use of Topical and Infiltrative Local Anesthetics in High-Risk Dermatologic Surgery.Journal of surgery and research · 2026Article
- Systemic Epinephrine Toxicity Following Topical Anesthetic Gel on Mucosal Surfaces: A Case Report and Literature Review.Clinical medicine insights. Case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Topical anesthetics are widely employed in dermatology for cosmetic interventions, laser therapies, and minor surgical procedures. Although generally safe, their systemic absorption is highly influenced by the integrity of the epidermal barrier. Inflammatory skin disorders such as psoriasis and atopic dermatitis compromise the stratum corneum (SC), facilitating enhanced percutaneous absorption and elevating the risk of systemic toxicity. This concern is particularly pertinent for potent agents such as lidocaine, tetracaine, and prilocaine, which, at elevated plasma concentrations, can induce central nervous system and cardiovascular complications, including seizures and arrhythmias. Barrier disruption promotes the passive diffusion of these lipophilic compounds, a process exacerbated by altered tight junctions, increased transepidermal water loss (TEWL), and heightened vascular permeability. Furthermore, inflammation-driven modifications in enzymatic activity may prolong anesthetic half-life, further increasing systemic exposure. Additional risk factors include the use of occlusive dressing techniques, prolonged application duration, and the concurrent use of multiple anesthetic agents. This review examines the pathophysiology of topical anesthetic absorption, the mechanisms underlying enhanced systemic exposure in the context of impaired epidermal integrity, and clinical strategies to mitigate toxicity. A nuanced understanding of these dynamics is crucial for optimizing the safe use of topical anesthetics, particularly in dermatologic and procedural care contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.