ArticleTranslational pediatrics2025
Childhood penetrating intracranial injury by non-metallic objects: a case report of three pediatric cases.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite being relatively rare, pediatric penetrating intracranial injuries entail substantial risks of secondary complications such as intracranial hemorrhage, infection, and mortality. Case Description: This case report describes three pediatric cases of penetrating intracranial injury caused by non-metallic objects, including two bamboo chopsticks and one pencil. In all cases, the patients presented with facial or orbital entry points and underwent prompt clinical evaluation, including computed tomography (CT) scans to assess foreign body location, injury trajectory, and potential complications. Tailored craniotomy approaches were selected based on imaging findings: pterional or subfrontal craniotomies were employed to access and safely extract the foreign bodies. Intraoperatively, great care was taken to avoid further neurological damage, and the dural defects were repaired using grafts and fibrin glue. Postoperatively, all patients received broad-spectrum antibiotics and sodium valproate to prevent infections and seizures, respectively. In two cases, postoperative fever and elevated white blood cell counts suggested intracranial infection, prompting escalation or adjustment of antibiotics, including ceftriaxone and meropenem. No cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage or long-term neurological sequelae were observed. Follow-up evaluations conducted up to three years post-surgery revealed preserved cognitive and sensory functions without signs of epilepsy or delayed complications. Conclusions: Notably, there were no occurrences of postoperative CSF fistula or epilepsy seizures, and intracranial infections were effectively managed. By documenting these three cases of pediatric intracranial penetrating brain injury, it is evident that accurate diagnosis and immediate surgical intervention are imperative in mitigating secondary brain injury and minimizing the risk of infection or hemorrhage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.