ArticleBiochemia medica2025
The impact of demand management on vitamin D testing.
Article in Biochemia medica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH-D) is essential for calcium homeostasis and bone health, with increasing evidence suggesting associations with non-skeletal diseases. However, the lack of consensus on optimal concentrations and laboratory variability has led to clinical uncertainty and excessive testing. This study evaluates the impact of demand management strategies and revised cut-off points on test volumes, unperformed determinations, and cost savings. Material and methods: A retrospective study (January 2015-May 2024) analyzed all 25-OH-D requests. Concentrations of 25-OH-D were measured using electrochemiluminescence assays on a Cobas C8000. An annual trend analysis of 25-OH-D test requests was performed to evaluate changes in demand. In 2018, vitamin D deficiency prevalence was assessed according to three cut-off values (75, 50 and 30 nmol/L). We assessed the impact of demand management rules, implemented in May 2022, to reduce unnecessary testing. The follow-up testing rate was calculated as the proportion of repeat tests within 12 months after determination. Results: There was 25-OH-D testing increased from 10,830 in 2015 to nearly 85,000 in 2023. Demand management strategies led to 12,406 rejections in 2022 (from May onwards), 16,809 in 2023, and 7566 in 2024 (until May), saving €85,600. Follow-up testing rates dropped from ~15% before 2022 to ~5% afterward. Lowering the deficiency threshold from 75 to 50 nmol/L reduced deficiency diagnoses from > 70% to < 50%; at 30 nmol/L, rates could drop to ~10-11%. Conclusions: Demand management strategies effectively reduce unnecessary testing and healthcare costs. Establishing appropriate reference values prevents overestimation of vitamin D deficiency, optimizing clinical and economic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.