Articlenpj Robotics2025
A soft robotic "Add-on" for colonoscopy: increasing safety and comfort through force monitoring.
Article in npj Robotics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Biodegradable caterpillar inspired soft robotic systems for targeted therapeutic delivery with intelligentRSC advances · 2026Review
- Progress and perspectives in soft robotics for surgery and rehabilitation.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Multi-modal sensing in colonoscopy: a data-driven approach.IEEE robotics and automation letters · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Colonoscopy is vital for diagnosing colorectal cancer, but limitations in instrument dexterity and sensor feedback can affect safety and patient comfort. We propose a disposable soft robotic "add-on" that attaches to existing endoscopic tools, enhancing safety without requiring custom instruments or workflow changes. The robot features soft optical sensors for 3D shape detection and force monitoring. If excessive force is detected, soft actuators redistribute pressure. A graphical interface provides real-time force data alongside the endoscope camera view. Validation experiments show accurate 3D shape reconstruction (8.51% curvature error, 9.67% orientation error) and force estimation up to 6 N with 3.38% accuracy. In-vitro tests confirm effective force redistribution, while ex-vivo tests on a bovine colon demonstrate smooth integration with minimal impact on the user learning curve. In-vivo swine studies validate safety and feasibility, confirming compatibility with existing tools and minimal disruption to clinical workflows, ensuring an efficient colonoscopy experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.