ReviewTherapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism2025
The impact of technology on impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes.
Review in Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Patient- and Function-Centric Model/Approach for Hypoglycemia Management in Older Adults.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Assessing thoughts, feelings and behaviours related to hypoglycaemia: Psychometric evaluation of the Hypoglycaemia Cues Questionnaire (HypoC-Q).Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2026Article
- Hospital-Treated Severe Hypoglycemia in Type 1 Diabetes in the US: A Retrospective Claims-Based Study of Diabetes-Related Complications and Direct Medical Costs.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Persistent Burden of Severe Hypoglycemia and Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycemia Among People With Type 1 Diabetes Despite Technology Use: A Follow-up Survey.Diabetes care · 2026Article
- Hypoglycemic coma owing to sensor device dysfunction after an automatic smartphone operating system update.Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Iatrogenic hypoglycaemia remains a major barrier to optimal glycaemic control required to prevent long-term complications in people with type 1 diabetes (pwT1D). Hypoglycaemia is the consequence of the interaction between absolute or relative insulin excess from treatment and compromised physiological defences against falling plasma glucose. With a longer duration of diabetes and repeated exposure to hypoglycaemia, pwT1D can develop impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IAH). IAH increases the risk of severe hypoglycaemia six-fold, causing significant morbidity, and, if left untreated, death. Over the last few decades, a stepwise change in diabetes management has been the introduction and widespread uptake of novel technologies, including continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and automated insulin delivery (AID) systems. These technologies aim to improve glycaemic control whilst minimising hypoglycaemia. Alarms and safety functions, such as suspension of insulin delivery, can help to reduce the hypoglycaemia burden. This review examines the role of continuous glucose monitors and AID systems in managing IAH, exploring evidence for their impact on symptomatic awareness and identifying areas for future research. In conclusion, there is strong evidence that CGM and AID systems improve glycaemic control and reduce the hypoglycaemia burden. However, despite the use of these technologies, severe hypoglycaemic episodes are not entirely eliminated, and it remains unclear whether their implementation restores the physiological symptoms and counter-regulatory response to hypoglycaemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.