ArticleFood chemistry: X2025
Multi-model risk assessment of pesticide residues in seasonal fruits based on integrated targeted/non-targeted screening: Implications for vulnerable populations.
Article in Food chemistry: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Occurrence, Dissipation and Risk Assessment of Widespread Pesticides and Their Metabolites in Pomegranates.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Deterministic and Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Chlorpyrifos Residues via Consumption of Tomato and Cucumber in Armenia.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study comprehensively analyzed multiple pesticide residues and their characteristics in commercially available fruits using integrated targeted and non-targeted techniques, with a focus on assessing health risks for children and pregnant women based on cumulative dietary risk models. Results showed 745 samples (7 categories) identified 54 pesticides (88.6 % detection rate; 1.1 % exceeding legal limits), with strawberries and peaches of the highest detection rates (98 %), and grapes the most diverse residues (avg. 6/sample). Risk ranking analysis flagged difenoconazole and indoxacarb as high-risk. Chronic cumulative exposure risks were dominated by hepatotoxic triazole fungicides. Acute risk assessments revealed potential hepatotoxicity concerns for children (3-6 years) and pregnant women consuming grapes/peaches. The Relative Potency Factor (RPF) model, accounting for synergism, showed 4-7 times higher neuro/hepatotoxicity risks than the Hazard Index (HI) model. This first integration of non-targeted screening with multi-model risk assessment provides evidence for strengthening pesticide regulation and protecting sensitive subpopulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.