ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
A machine learning-based prediction of diabetic retinopathy using the Korea national health and nutrition examination survey (2008-2012, 2017-2021).
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Five-year systemic complications in diabetic retinopathy with integrated optical coherence tomography angiography and glycated hemoglobin.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Detection of referable diabetic retinopathy using machine learning on routine clinical data.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Machine learning technology that uses available clinical data to predict diabetic retinopathy (DR) can be highly valuable in medical settings where fundus cameras are not accessible. Objective: This study aimed to develop and compare machine learning algorithms for predicting DR without fundus image. Methods: We used data from Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2008-2012 and 2017-2021) and enrolled individuals aged ≥ 20 years with diabetes who received fundus examination. Predictive models for DR were developed using logistic regression and three machine learning algorithms: extreme gradient boosting, decision tree, and random forest. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and accuracy for the diagnosis of DR, and feature importance was determined using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP). Results: Among the 3,026 diabetic participants (male, 50.7%; mean age, 63.7 ± 10.5 years), 671 (22.2%) had DR. The random forest model, using 16 variables, achieved the highest AUC of 0.748 (95% confidence interval, 0.705-0.790) with a sensitivity 0.669, specificity of 0.729 and an accuracy of 0.715. As interpreted by SHAP, HbA1c, fasting glucose levels, duration of diabetes, and body mass index were identified as common key determinants influencing the model's outcomes. Conclusion: The DR prediction models using machine learning techniques demonstrated reliable performance even without fundus imaging, with the random forest model showing particularly strong results. These models could assist in managing DR by identifying high-risk patients, enabling timely ophthalmic referrals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.