ReviewJAACAP open2025
Narrative Review: A Neurobiological Perspective on Resilience in Youth.
Review in JAACAP open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Substance Abuse Problems and Serious Mental Illness/Serious Emotional Distress on Post-Discharge Residential Status Among Clients With Behavioral and Cognitive Disorders: Evidence From SAMHSA MH-CLD Data.Public health challenges · 2026Article
- Melatonin's role in ameliorating perturbed circadian immune molecular links with aging and sleep deprivation in central and peripheral clocks in male Wistar rats.Biogerontology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Children and adolescents are faced with multiple factors that may pose risks for development of psychiatric morbidity. These include both inherited and environmental factors such as a family history of depression or experiencing adversity. However, not all individuals who have such risks develop illness, due to resilience factors that effectively provide protection from risk. The topic of resilience has received much attention in research in recent years. Its importance lies in improving our theoretical understanding of protection from illness and may also pave the way for psychoeducation to families and intervention for youth. Method: Understanding the neurobiology underlying resilience may reveal brain-based methods to protect mental health. Relevant literature from 2008 to 2023 was searched for neuroimaging studies that demonstrated youth outcomes linked with fewer psychiatric symptoms or better functioning in the face of psychiatric risks. Results: This narrative review summarizes current evidence pertaining to the neurobiological underpinnings of resilience, including anatomical, functional, and genetic perspectives of the hippocampus, amygdala, prefrontal and cingulate cortices, white matter tracts, and related networks in youth with environmental or inherited psychiatric risks. In addition, a functional and developmental overview of the involved regions is provided for a comprehensive understanding. Avenues for further research are also discussed. Conclusion: Psychiatric resilience in youth is linked with multiple neurobiological and genetic features. This evidence could be leveraged toward identification and intervention development to protect mental health in the face of risks. Clinical guidance: • When constructing clinical case formulations, it is important to include both risk and resilience factors, to reflect parallels in the structure and function of the brain.• In psychoeducation with youth and families, consider inclusion of evidence indicating neurobiological strengths to promote better outcomes.• Functional aspects of the brain, including neurobiology underlying resilience needs to be studied and targeted to develop effective prevention and intervention programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.