Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40521104›Full record

ArticleNature. Mental health2025

The Global Flourishing Study: Study Profile and Initial Results on Flourishing.

Tyler J VanderWeele, Byron R Johnson, Piotr T Bialowolski, Rebecca Bonhag, Matt Bradshaw, Thomas Breedlove, Brendan Case, Ying Chen, Zhuo Job Chen, Victor Counted and 37 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature. Mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

47 authors.

Tyler J VanderWeeleHarvard University, Cambridge, MA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6112-0239
Byron R JohnsonBaylor University, Waco, TX USA.
Piotr T BialowolskiKozminski University, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4102-0107
Rebecca BonhagBaylor University, Waco, TX USA.
Matt BradshawBaylor University, Waco, TX USA.
Thomas BreedloveBaylor University, Waco, TX USA.
Brendan CaseHarvard University, Cambridge, MA USA.
Ying ChenHarvard University, Cambridge, MA USA.
Zhuo Job ChenUniversity of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC USA.
Victor CountedRegent University, Virginia Beach, VA USA.
Richard G CowdenHarvard University, Cambridge, MA USA.
Pedro Antonio de la RosaUniversity of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Chris FeltonHarvard University, Cambridge, MA USA.
Alex FoglemanBaylor University, Waco, TX USA.
Cristina GibsonPepperdine University, Malibu, CA USA.
Nikolitsa GrigoropoulouUniversity of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Craig GundersenBaylor University, Waco, TX USA.
Sung Joon JangBaylor University, Waco, TX USA.
Kathryn A JohnsonArizona State University, Tempe, AZ USA.
Blake Victor KentWestmont College, Santa Barbara, CA USA.
Eric S KimUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1510-8976
Young-Il KimGeorge Fox University, Newberg, OR USA.
Hayami K KogaHarvard University, Cambridge, MA USA.
Matthew T LeeHarvard University, Cambridge, MA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3652-280X
Noemi Le PertelInstitute for Global Flourishing, New York, NY USA.
Tim LomasHarvard University, Cambridge, MA USA.
Katelyn N G LongHarvard University, Cambridge, MA USA.
Lucía MacchiaCity University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9558-4747
Christos A MakridisBaylor University, Waco, TX USA.
Lesley MarkhamCenter for Open Science, Charlottesville, VA USA.
Julia S NakamuraUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia Canada.
Nicholas Norman-KrauseBelmont University, Nashville, TN USA.
Chukwuemeka N OkaforUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX USA.
Sakurako S OkuzonoHarvard University, Cambridge, MA USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2887-4415
Suzanne T OuyangHarvard University, Cambridge, MA USA.ORCID 0009-0007-1995-6482
R Noah PadgettHarvard University, Cambridge, MA USA.
Jason PaltzerWisconsin Lutheran College, Wauwatosa, WI USA.
James L Ritchie-DunhamUniversity of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7305-1624
Zacc RitterGallup, Washington, DC USA.
Koichiro ShibaBoston University, Boston, MA USA.
Rajesh SrinivasanGallup, Washington, DC USA.
John SsoziBaylor University, Waco, TX USA.
Dorota Weziak-BialowolskaKozminski University, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2711-2283
Renae WilkinsonHarvard University, Cambridge, MA USA.
Robert D WoodberryBaylor University, Waco, TX USA.
Jennifer WorthamHarvard University, Cambridge, MA USA.
George YanceyBaylor University, Waco, TX USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Global Flourishing Study is a longitudinal panel study of over 200,000 participants in 22 geographically and culturally diverse countries, spanning all six populated continents, with nationally representative sampling and intended annual survey data collection for 5 years to assess numerous aspects of flourishing and its possible determinants. The study is intended to expand our knowledge of the distribution and determinants of flourishing around the world. Relations between a composite flourishing index and numerous demographic characteristics are reported. Participants were also surveyed about their childhood experiences, which were analyzed to determine their associations with subsequent adult flourishing. Analyses are presented both across and within countries, and discussion is given as to how the demographic and childhood relationships vary by country and which patterns appear to be universal versus culturally specific. Brief comment is also given on the results of a whole series of papers in the Global Flourishing Study Special Collection, employing similar analyses, but with more-specific aspects of well-being. The Global Flourishing Study expands our knowledge of the distribution and determinants of well-being and provides foundational knowledge for the promotion of societal flourishing.

Indexed as

Social sciencesSociology

Identifiers

PMID40521104
PMCPMC12165845

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.