Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40522118›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in critical care2025

Enriching patient populations in ICU trials: reducing heterogeneity through machine learning.

Wonsuk Oh, Marinela Veshtaj, Ankit Sakhuja

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in critical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Artificial intelligence-guided nutritional therapy in the ICU.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wonsuk OhCharles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine.
Marinela VeshtajDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mount Sinai Morningside.
Ankit SakhujaCharles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine.

Funding

Using Novel Machine Learning Methods to Personalize Strategies for Prevention of Persistent AKI after Cardiac SurgeryK08DK131286 · NIDDK · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Ankit Sakhuja · 2022 to 2026
$774k
NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK131286
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewDespite the pivotal role of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in critical care research, many have failed to demonstrate significant benefits, particularly in nutrition interventions. This review highlights how patient heterogeneity affects trial outcomes and explores how artificial intelligence and machine learning can address this issue by identifying subgroups with distinct treatment responses, improving trial design, and enhancing the precision of nutritional interventions. RECENT

findingsRCTs estimate the average treatment effect, which can obscure heterogeneous treatment effects, where some patients benefit while others experience no effect or harm. Recent studies highlight that artificial intelligence techniques such as clustering, predictive modeling, causal artificial intelligence, and reinforcement learning have the potential to individualize treatments and decrease heterogeneity in trials. Digital twins and artificial intelligence-driven adaptive trial designs further enable personalized interventions, optimizing study populations and improving treatment precision. SUMMARY: The integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning into clinical trials offers a powerful strategy to refine patient selection, reduce variability, and enhance the detection of meaningful treatment effects. These advancements hold significant potential to transform critical care nutrition research, leading to more precise, personalized, and effective interventions.

Indexed as

Critical CareCritical IllnessIntensive Care UnitsMachine LearningPatient SelectionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicArtificial IntelligenceHumansPrecision MedicineResearch Designcritical care nutritionheterogeneity in clinical trialsmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40522118
PMCPMC12259358

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.