Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40522287›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

Rate of brain aging associates with future executive function in Asian children and older adults.

Susan F Cheng, Wan Lin Yue, Kwun Kei Ng, Xing Qian, Siwei Liu, Trevor W K Tan, Kim-Ngan Nguyen, Ruth L F Leong, Saima Hilal, Ching-Yu Cheng and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Susan F ChengIntegrative Sciences and Engineering Programme, NUS Graduate School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1201-2880
Wan Lin YueIntegrative Sciences and Engineering Programme, NUS Graduate School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Kwun Kei NgYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0584-7679
Xing QianYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Siwei LiuYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Trevor W K TanIntegrative Sciences and Engineering Programme, NUS Graduate School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Kim-Ngan NguyenYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Ruth L F LeongYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Saima HilalYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Ching-Yu ChengSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Ai Peng TanYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Evelyn C LawSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences (SICS), A*STAR Research Entities (ARES), Singapore, Singapore.
Peter D GluckmanSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences (SICS), A*STAR Research Entities (ARES), Singapore, Singapore.
Christopher Li-Hsian ChenYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Yap Seng ChongYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Michael J MeaneyYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Michael W L CheeYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
B T Thomas Yeo *Integrative Sciences and Engineering Programme, NUS Graduate School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0119-3276
Juan Helen Zhou *Integrative Sciences and Engineering Programme, NUS Graduate School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0180-8648

Funding

National University of Singapore Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine Research Core FundingSingapore A*STAR A20G8b0102Singapore Ministry of Education MOE-T2EP20220-0001Singapore Ministry of Education MOE-T2EP2-0223-0025Singapore Ministry of Education MOE-T2EP40120-0007Singapore National Medical Research Council CIRG21nov-0007Singapore National Medical Research Council HLCA23Feb-0004Singapore National Medical Research Council NMRC/CG/435 M009/2017-NUH/NUHSSingapore National Medical Research Council NMRC/CIRG/1485/2018Singapore National Medical Research Council NMRC/CSA-SI/0007/2016Singapore National Medical Research Council NMRC/MOH-00707-01Singapore National Medical Research Council NMRC/OFLCG19May-0035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain age has emerged as a powerful tool to understand neuroanatomical aging and its link to health outcomes like cognition. However, there remains a lack of studies investigating the rate of brain aging and its relationship to cognition. Furthermore, most brain age models are trained and tested on cross-sectional data from primarily Caucasian, adult participants. It is thus unclear how well these models generalize to non-Caucasian participants, especially children. Here, we tested a previously published deep learning model on Singaporean elderly participants (55-88 years old) and children (4-11 years old). We found that the model directly generalized to the elderly participants, but model finetuning was necessary for children. After finetuning, we found that the rate of change in brain age gap was associated with future executive function performance in both elderly participants and children. We further found that lateral ventricles and frontal areas contributed to brain age prediction in elderly participants, while white matter and posterior brain regions were more important in predicting brain age of children. Taken together, our results suggest that there is potential for generalizing brain age models to diverse populations. Moreover, the longitudinal change in brain age gap reflects developing and aging processes in the brain, relating to future cognitive function.

Indexed as

AgingBrainExecutive FunctionAgedAged, 80 and overAsian PeopleChildChild, PreschoolCognitionCross-Sectional StudiesDeep LearningFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle Agedagingbrain agedevelopmenthumanlongitudinalmachine learningneuroscienceT1-weighted MRI

Identifiers

PMID40522287
PMCPMC12169851

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.